Readiness reporting for a different Army / Christopher G. Pernin, Dwayne M. Butler, Louay Constant, Lily Geyer, Duncan Long, Dan Madden, John E. Peters, Jim Powers, Michael Shurkin.
The Army has developed an impressive capacity to adapt to emerging requirements by providing units with new capabilities rapidly and flexibly as units prepare for deployment through the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) process. The Army's ability to report on readiness throughout these adaptati...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full text (Open Access) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Contributors: | , |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Santa Monica, CA :
RAND,
[2013]
|
| Series: | Research report (Rand Corporation) ;
RR230. |
| Subjects: | |
| Local Note: | JSTOR |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | in00000375659 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 131020s2013 caua obt 000 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240819205806.4 | ||
| 019 | |a 1058534728 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833083753 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 0833083759 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780833080325 | ||
| 020 | |z 0833080326 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)861119962 |z (OCoLC)1058534728 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)ocn861119962 | ||
| 037 | |a 22573/ctt4cxdh8 |b JSTOR | ||
| 040 | |a DID |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DID |d KLG |d JSTOR |d OCLCF |d OCLCQ |d TEF |d CUS |d LND |d LOA |d VFL |d ICG |d OCLCA |d OCL |d U3W |d CEF |d OCLCQ |d AU@ |d ERL |d ICN |d NJT |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a UA25 |b .P36 2013 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a TEC025000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a HIS027060 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 355.00973 |2 23 |
| 088 | |a RAND RR230 | ||
| 099 | |a Open Access |b JSTOR | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pernin, Christopher G., |d 1973- |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjDC7bFF87yCprCpFkBjcq | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Readiness reporting for a different Army / |c Christopher G. Pernin, Dwayne M. Butler, Louay Constant, Lily Geyer, Duncan Long, Dan Madden, John E. Peters, Jim Powers, Michael Shurkin. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA : |b RAND, |c [2013] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xxiii, 139 pages) : |b color illustrations | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a text file | ||
| 347 | |b PDF | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a RAND Corporation research report series ; |v RR230 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 131-139). | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Introduction. -- Building new capabilities and readiness reporting. -- Exploring the value of the MTOE for readiness reporting. -- From readiness to capabilities: ready for what? -- Transitioning to the future and recommendations. -- Appendix A. Literature -- Appendix B. Selected rapid capability organizations -- Appendix C. MTOE scrubs -- Appendix D. Framework for considering root causes of assigned missions. | |
| 520 | |a The Army has developed an impressive capacity to adapt to emerging requirements by providing units with new capabilities rapidly and flexibly as units prepare for deployment through the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) process. The Army's ability to report on readiness throughout these adaptations, however, is challenged. The readiness reporting system is largely predicated on a bottom-up, deliberate process with known milestones and pre-determined designs to which the Army would build readiness. As those targets are changed, for instance when deploying to a changing operational environment as was seen in Iraq and Afghanistan, the reporting system cannot easily keep up. The key challenge to readiness reporting is that Army units now routinely prepare for assigned missions that sometimes differ in meaningful ways from their designed missions. This study examines the Army's readiness reporting system in light of the increased adaptiveness demonstrated by Army units in the past decade. In this study we found that while the readiness reporting system still works as originally intended, the current readiness reporting system captures only a portion of the adaptations readily seen in recent years. The study offers recommendations to better reflect these adaptations in the readiness reporting system. | ||
| 536 | |a The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. W74V8H-06-C-0001. | ||
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed October 20, 2013). | |
| 590 | |a JSTOR |b Books at JSTOR Open Access | ||
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Army |x Operational readiness |x Evaluation. |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Army |x Reorganization |x Evaluation. |
| 710 | 2 | |a Arroyo Center. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Rand Corporation. | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Research report (Rand Corporation) ; |v RR230. | |
| 852 | |b EBooks |h Open Access JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhvmf |z Full text (Open Access) |t 0 |
| 947 | |a FLO |x Open Access JSTOR | ||
| 994 | |a 92 |b FEN | ||
| 999 | f | f | |s 3af7afc7-3415-4608-bf91-a30d6284f00d |i 3e2e545a-80ce-47bd-89a7-eb5709d0fd7a |t 0 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a Emerson College |b Main Campus |c Emerson College Library |d EBooks |t 0 |e Open Access JSTOR |h Other scheme |i E-Resource |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |t 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhvmf |z Full text (Open Access) |